On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 09:38:06PM +0200, FX wrote: > > It seems that some of these extensions are not caught by -std=f95 > > I?ve now audited the I/O specifiers for such warnings too. A warning existed > only for EXIST, which was introduced way back by Steve: > > > 2010-07-05 Steven G. Kargl <ka...@gcc.gnu.org> > > > > PR fortran/44797 > > * fortran/io.c (resolve_tag): Check EXIST tag is a default logical. > > I?ve extended the logical warning to the NAMED, OPENED, and PENDING > specifiers. I?ve also audited the integer specifiers, and extended the > warning to NUMBER, NEXTREC, and RECL, which were missing. > > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-apple-darwin13, OK to commit? >
Yes. -- Steve
