On 6 June 2014 01:32, Joseph S. Myers <jos...@codesourcery.com> wrote: > Have these been tested for both big and little endian (especially for > tests where memory layout matters - load / store / lane number tests - > remembering that GNU C vector initializers always use array ordering, > which is not the same as the architecture-defined lane numbering for big > endian)? >
I did run the tests on armeb-none-linux-gnueabihf (with qemu), and in addition to the FAILs I already mentionned I can see errors in the vzip and vuzp tests. At this stage I don't know if it's a bug in my tests or a compiler bug. However my tests initialize vectors using vld1, not vector initializers so I think there shouldn't be this problem. Christophe.
