On 5 June 2014 14:37, James Greenhalgh <james.greenha...@arm.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 08:00:51PM +0100, Vladimir Makarov wrote: >> On 2014-06-03, 6:02 PM, James Greenhalgh wrote: >> > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 06:38:22PM +0100, Vladimir Makarov wrote: >> >> The following patch PR61325. The details can be found on >> >> >> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61325 >> >> >> >> The patch was bootstrapped and tested on x86/x86-64. >> >> >> >> Committed as rev. 211060 to gcc-4.9 branch and as rev.211061 to trunk. >> >> >> >> 2014-05-29 Vladimir Makarov <vmaka...@redhat.com> >> >> >> >> PR rtl-optimization/61325 >> >> * lra-constraints.c (process_address): Rename to >> >> process_address_1. >> >> (process_address): New function. >> >> >> >> 2014-05-29 Vladimir Makarov <vmaka...@redhat.com> >> >> >> >> PR rtl-optimization/61325 >> >> * gcc.target/aarch64/pr61325.c: New. >> > >> > Hi Vlad, >> > >> > This patch appears to cause issues where the ARM backend can get stuck in a >> > seemingly infinite loop. >> > >> > Compiling: >> > >> > ./gcc.c-torture/compile/unalign-1.c >> > >> >> Sorry for inconvenience. >> >> Could you test the following patch > > Hi Vlad, > > The patch works for me. I've bootstrapped and tested it on > arm-none-linux-gnueabihf. It has also had a regression run on > aarch64-none-elf. > Cristophe, did you get a chance to do any more thorough testing of the patch? > > From my perspective, I think this should go in, and be backported to 4.9. > > Thanks, > James > >
I did run the tests and saw several regressions. As I wasn't very confident, I have relaunched my tests, they are still running. Christophe.
