On Fri, 2014-05-30 at 15:49 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 08:09:22AM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote: > > On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 14:07 -0500, Peter Bergner wrote: > > > On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 09:36 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > > > This is being discussed in the thread at > > > > <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg02031.html>. Until that > > > > has been resolved, I do agree to check in the following patch (and have > > > > successfully tested it, but cannot formally approve it for commit; thus > > > > copying the libsanitizer maintainers): > > > > > > The re-enablement patch was submitted to the llvm mailing list here: > > > > > > > > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140526/219249.html > > > > > > Once that is committed and merged into gcc, we can re-enable building > > > libsanitizer for powerpc*-linux. > > > > Ok, it was committed upstream as revision 209879. Kostya, can we get > > this merged into gcc trunk and powerpc*-linux re-enabled again? Thanks. > > I've cherry-picked the two upstream commits and after testing on > x86_64-linux/i686-linux committed to trunk.
Great, thanks! I bootstrapped and ran the asan testsuite. I'm now seeing lots of FAILs due to: ASan runtime does not come first in initial library list; you should either link runtime to your application or manually preload it with LD_PRELOAD. ...which Paolo mentioned in the other thread that he is hitting this too. There was some discussion on what to do, but has there been a decision on how to fix this yet? Or is it fixed upstream and we just need to merge that fix too? Peter
