Re: [patch i386]: Expand sibling-tail-calls via accumulator register

[Kai Tietz]

So, completed bootstrap and regression-test for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu 
(multilib) by using following predicate for sibcall-patch.

(define_predicate "sibcall_memory_operand"
  (match_operand 0 "memory_operand")
{
  return CONSTANT_P (op);
})


Worked fine, no regressions.  Is sibcall-patch ok with that predicate to be 
applied?

Regards,
Kai