On 05/23/14 02:58, Kai Tietz wrote:
Hello,
yes the underlying issue is the same as for PR/46219. Nevertheless
the patch doesn't solve this mentioned PR as I used for know a pretty
conservative checking of allowed memories. By extending
x86_sibcall_memory_p_1 function about allowing register-arguments too
for memory, this problem can be solved.
BTW, do you want to add 46219 to your list?
At the least, I think we should add the test from 46219 to the suite,
xfailed if you don't tackle it as a part of this work.
jeff
