Since it is in trunk and gcc-4_9-branch, there is no need to put into google branches -- will get it automatically after next merge.
David On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Carrot Wei <car...@google.com> wrote: > Committed to trunk, 4.9, and waiting for the release of 4.8.3. > > OK for google/main and google/4.9? > > thanks > Carrot > > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> wrote: >> On Wed, 21 May 2014, Marcus Shawcroft wrote: >> >>> On 21 May 2014 09:28, Marcus Shawcroft <marcus.shawcr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > On 20 May 2014 18:37, Carrot Wei <car...@google.com> wrote: >>> >> Hi James >>> >> >>> >> Thank you for pointing this out. In the new patch I removed the >>> >> modification of vqdmulh_n_s32 and vqdmulhq_n_s32. >>> >> >>> >> Passed dejagnu testing on aarch64 qemu again. OK for trunk, 4.9 and 4.8? >>> >> >>> >> 2014-05-20 Guozhi Wei <car...@google.com> >>> >> >>> >> * config/aarch64/arm_neon.h (vqdmulh_n_s16): Change >>> >> the last operand's constraint. >>> >> (vqdmulhq_n_s16): Likewise. >>> > >>> > Thank you. This is OK to commit on trunk, 4.9 and 4.8 >>> > /Marcus >>> >>> Actually, I've jumped the gun by saying OK for 4.8. Please hold off on >>> the 4.8 backport until one of the release maintainers says its OK. >>> Richie can we take this now or do you want us to hold off? >> >> Please wait for 4.8.3 to be released for non-regression fixes or >> regression fixes that are not against a working 4.8.2. >> >> Thanks, >> Richard.
