On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 04:50:35PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 05/13/2014 03:21 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > >So the debugger doesn't have to guess the properties of the enum's > >underlying base type, like size, encoding and signedness. > > Well, the enum already has DW_AT_byte_size. It seems to me that it should > also have DW_AT_encoding to provide the other two properties you mention.
Right, that is the idea, since an enum doesn't provide those attributes, it should have a reference to the underlying base type that provides them. Then it can also drop the DW_AT_byte_size, if it is different from the underlying base type, but that is a followup patch. Thanks, Mark
