On Fri, 16 May 2014, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > has variable. Guess the combination of IBM long double and __int128_t > (for long long it is still ok) is rare enough that we don't need to care > about it (alternative would be e.g. to compare against addition of
There are existing problems with that combination anyway. fp-int-convert-timode.c has tests disabled for it because the compile-time and runtime conversions don't agree (whether for this issue or some other, I don't know). -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
