Skip to site navigation (Press enter)
Re: [C++ Patch] Add IS_DIRECT_INITIALIZER?
Jason Merrill
Wed, 14 May 2014 11:34:49 -0700
The name suggests that it would be true for any direct initialization,
which is wrong; see TARGET_EXPR_DIRECT_INIT_P (and the similarly wrongly
named DIRECT_INIT_EXPR_P).
Call your macro DIRECT_LIST_INIT_P and it's OK.
Jason
Previous message
View by thread
View by date
Next message
[C++ Patch] Add IS_DIRECT_INITIALIZER?
Paolo Carlini
Re: [C++ Patch] Add IS_DIRECT_INITIALIZER?
Paolo Carlini
Re: [C++ Patch] Add IS_DIRECT_INITIALIZER?
Jason Merrill
Re: [C++ Patch] Add IS_DIRECT_INITIALIZER?
Paolo Carlini
Reply via email to
Search the site
The Mail Archive home
gcc-patches - all messages
gcc-patches - about the list
Expand
Previous message
Next message