On 05/14/14 09:28, David Malcolm wrote:
Thanks.I'm working my way through the patches, converting them to the latest approach, where "gimple_phi" becomes "gphi *". Given that renaming, it occurred to me that the new class "gimple_phi_iterator" would be better named as "gphi_iterator" (consistency, and less typing). Is this renaming OK? (I wasn't planning to rename the pre-existing gimple_stmt_iterator)
Yea, that's fine. jeff
