Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Andrew Burgess <aburg...@broadcom.com> wrote:
> > On 09/05/2014 9:53 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > > Andrew Burgess <aburg...@broadcom.com> wrote:
> > > > if ((AUTO_DEMANGLING || GNU_DEMANGLING))
> > > > {
> > > > success = gnu_special (work, &mangled, &decl);
> > > > + if (!success)
> > > > + {
> > > > + delete_work_stuff (work);
> > > > + string_delete (&decl);
> > > > + }
> > >
> > > As far as I can see, decl may be uninitialized at this point. I
> > > don't think you can call string_delete. You need to ensure that
> > > decl is initialized somehow.
> >
> > There's a call to string_init on decl about 10 lines above the
> > above diff, just outside of context, but it's unconditional, so
> > I figured that would be enough.
> >
> > Also, if gnu_special returns false, and the call to
> > demangle_prefix returns false then we call (near the bottom of
> > internal_cplus_demangle) mop_up, which calls string_delete.
> >
> > Given that decl is initialised once, assuming that the string is
> > only released using delete_string then the internal state will
> > have been reset back to NULL, so calling delete_string should be
> > safe again.
>
> Right, sorry for the noise.
>
> This patch is OK.
Andrew, would you like me to commit this?
Thanks,
Gary
--
http://gbenson.net/
