Konstantin Serebryany <konstantin.s.serebry...@gmail.com> writes:
>> I am still against the way Libsanitizer is being maintained.
>
> I do not enjoy it either. Suggestions are welcome, and see below!
>
>> I really think the maintainers of the source in gcc should submit the
>> patches upstream and not burden the target maintainers with it.
>
> This is impossible, sorry.
> We do not know how to fix a platform we do not have access to
> ourselves and we can not accept patches for upstream
Nobody expects you to: if things break for Solaris in Go/libgo by a
merge from upstream, I try to get things fixed in the gcc tree and the
changes are pushed back later (or rather: first integrated upstream and
than, often simulaneously, merged back into gcc).
> other than by following the standard process because this will violate
> the LLVM developer policy.
Which says what? Your current policy seems to massively impede
contributions.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
