Hi,

this regression unfortunately has to do with my fix for c++/57887, thus the code in maybe_begin_member_template_processing:

   if (nsdmi)
     decl = (CLASSTYPE_TEMPLATE_INFO (DECL_CONTEXT (decl))
         ? CLASSTYPE_TI_TEMPLATE (DECL_CONTEXT (decl))
         : NULL_TREE);

The check is true for the new testcase and we end up with an unsubstituted STATIC_CAST_EXPR which leads to an ICE in cxx_eval_constant_expression. Having tried a number of ideas (by now we have got quite a few testcases in this area), I think it makes sense to check uses_template_parms too on DECL_CONTEXT (decl): when it returns false I don't think we may run into uses of template parms a la c++/57887 and we are back to the status pre- that fix in nsdmi handling.

Tested x86_64-linux.

Thanks,
Paolo.

/////////////////////


/cp
2014-04-30  Paolo Carlini  <paolo.carl...@oracle.com>

        PR c++/60999
        * pt.c (maybe_begin_member_template_processing): Use
        uses_template_parms.

/testsuite
2014-04-30  Paolo Carlini  <paolo.carl...@oracle.com>

        PR c++/60999
        * g++.dg/cpp0x/nsdmi-template9.C: New.
Index: cp/pt.c
===================================================================
--- cp/pt.c     (revision 209916)
+++ cp/pt.c     (working copy)
@@ -463,6 +463,7 @@ maybe_begin_member_template_processing (tree decl)
 
   if (nsdmi)
     decl = (CLASSTYPE_TEMPLATE_INFO (DECL_CONTEXT (decl))
+           && uses_template_parms (DECL_CONTEXT (decl))
            ? CLASSTYPE_TI_TEMPLATE (DECL_CONTEXT (decl))
            : NULL_TREE);
 
Index: testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/nsdmi-template9.C
===================================================================
--- testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/nsdmi-template9.C    (revision 0)
+++ testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/nsdmi-template9.C    (working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+// PR c++/60999
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+template <typename A>
+struct foo
+{
+};
+  
+template<>
+struct foo<int>
+{
+  static constexpr int code = 42;
+  unsigned int bar = static_cast<unsigned int>(code);
+};
+  
+foo<int> a;

Reply via email to