>>>>> "Prathamesh" == Prathamesh Kulkarni <bilbotheelffri...@gmail.com> writes:
Prathamesh> Use macro CPP_PEDANTIC (PF) instead of directly using Prathamesh> it's definition: CPP_OPTION (PF, cpp_pedantic). I'm curious why you want this. Prathamesh> [libcpp] Prathamesh> * directives.c (_cpp_handle_directive): Use CPP_PEDANTIC macro. Prathamesh> * macro.c (parse_params): Likewise. Prathamesh> Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Prathamesh> OK for trunk ? Regardless of why, it is ok. If it is just for clarity, though, I suppose I wonder why CPP_PEDANTIC and CPP_WTRADITIONAL are given special definitions. Perhaps instead they should be removed in favor of just CPP_OPTION everywhere. Though this also seems of marginal usefulness. Tom
