On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 6:23 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:59 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> On 11/19/13 19:33, David Malcolm wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> FWIW, it looks like you attached the whitespace cleanup patch again, >>>> rather than the one you discuss above. >>>> >>>> For the archives, it looks like your email is referring to r205074 >>>> (though that itself seems to have some purely whitespace fixes, together >>>> with the real changes). >>> >>> Nuts. >>> >>> Here's the actual change I meant to attach. >>> >>> Sorry about that, thanks for catching it. >>> >>> Jeff >>> >>> >>> commit f28876ff94428d3109e9e575d6a2d62d23af8092 >>> Author: law <law@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4> >>> Date: Wed Nov 20 01:55:17 2013 +0000 >>> >>> * tree-ssa-threadedge.c (thread_across_edge): After threading >>> through a joiner, allow threading a normal block requiring >>> duplication. >>> >>> * tree-ssa-threadupdate.c (thread_block_1): Improve code to detect >>> jump threading requests that would muck up the loop structures. >>> >>> git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@205074 >>> 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4 >>> >> >> This caused: >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59221 >> > > It also caused: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59597 >
This also caused: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60957 -- H.J.
