On 04/23/2014 12:43 PM, Marc Glisse wrote: > Would mangling the aarch64 builtins be a lot of work? Did other platforms > break > as well?
Hmm. Apparently, aarch64 already *has* mangling support, but it's broken. The node is built with DFmode in aarch64_init_simd_builtins, but then (not) matched with V2DFmode in aarch64_mangle_type and its table. The same appears to be true with every single one of the aarch64 backend types, so I have no idea what is intended here. I'm going to have to leave this to the ARM maintainers to clear up. r~
