On Tuesday 15 April 2014 23:36:51 Paolo Carlini wrote: > Those should be isolated and a compiler bug report opened including a > minimized reproducer.
I'm not sure if this is a compiler bug or simply due to the fact that I didn't add the virtual function to the ABI linker script. > Anyway, the real issue is indeed that implementing those bits requires a > new virtual function, and that would break the ABI. We do have a bug in > Bugzilla tracking the issue. But now that 4.9 has branched isn't it acceptable to extent the ABI? Regards, Rüdiger
