> - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg01370.html > PR sanitizer/56781 > fix --with-build-config=bootstrap-ubsan bootstrap of lto-plugin
I have no particular problem with this patch, although the build has gotten beyond my full understanding these days... However, does this fix a regression? If not, it should wait for stage1. > - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg01433.html > PR sanitizer/56781 > fix --with-build-config=bootstrap-asan bootstrap of lto-plugin Are we really going to multilib libiberty for every "useful" option we think of? For the build/host, we have a generic way of providing CFLAGS, and for the target we already have a multilib structure.
