On April 8, 2014 8:03:08 PM CEST, Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: >On 04/08/2014 07:58 AM, Richard Biener wrote: >> Jason, is <clone> good or shall I use sth else (do we annotate >in-charge vs. not in-charge >> constructors specially for example?). > >The names of the in-charge and not-in-charge constructor clones are >complete_ctor_identifier and base_ctor_identifier (and dtor for >destructors); you could check for those.
I was more asking for how we present those To the user in diagnostics. I wanted to use a consistent 'quoting' style. If using <clone> is fine then I'll just stick to that. OK for trunk? Thanks, Richard. >Jason
