Hi!

Ping.

On Fri, 07 Mar 2014 21:21:48 +0100, I wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 14:44:45 -0700, Aldy Hernandez <al...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > I fixed a few nits Jason pointed out off-line, and both him and Jakub 
> > have approved the patch for trunk.
> > 
> > In running the final round of tests I noticed a few problems with my 
> > choice of bit numbers for the GF_OMP_* masks.  I fixed them, and re-ran 
> > tests on x86-64 Linux.
> > 
> > Attached is the final version of the patch I have committed to trunk.
> 
> > Date:   Mon Oct 14 18:32:13 2013 -0500
> 
> > --- a/gcc/omp-low.c
> > +++ b/gcc/omp-low.c
> 
> > @@ -3587,7 +3619,7 @@ lower_rec_input_clauses (tree clauses, gimple_seq 
> > *ilist, gimple_seq *dlist,
> >        /* Don't add any barrier for #pragma omp simd or
> >      #pragma omp distribute.  */
> >        if (gimple_code (ctx->stmt) != GIMPLE_OMP_FOR
> > -     || gimple_omp_for_kind (ctx->stmt) == GF_OMP_FOR_KIND_FOR)
> > +     || gimple_omp_for_kind (ctx->stmt) & GF_OMP_FOR_KIND_FOR)
> >     gimple_seq_add_stmt (ilist, build_omp_barrier (NULL_TREE));
> >      }
> 
> Maybe it's just too late on a Friday evening, but I don't understand this
> change, part of r204863.  GF_OMP_FOR_KIND_FOR has the value zero;
> shouldn't this comparison have remained unchanged?  Is the following
> (untested) patch OK for trunk?  Does this need a test case?
> 
> commit f3c7834ecbedc50e04223d24b1b671fc8a62c169
> Author: Thomas Schwinge <tho...@codesourcery.com>
> Date:   Fri Mar 7 21:11:43 2014 +0100
> 
>     Restore check for OpenMP for construct.
>     
>       gcc/
>       * omp-low.c (lower_rec_input_clauses) <build_omp_barrier>: Restore
>       check for GF_OMP_FOR_KIND_FOR.
> 
> diff --git gcc/omp-low.c gcc/omp-low.c
> index 4dc3956..713a4ae 100644
> --- gcc/omp-low.c
> +++ gcc/omp-low.c
> @@ -3915,7 +3915,7 @@ lower_rec_input_clauses (tree clauses, gimple_seq 
> *ilist, gimple_seq *dlist,
>        /* Don't add any barrier for #pragma omp simd or
>        #pragma omp distribute.  */
>        if (gimple_code (ctx->stmt) != GIMPLE_OMP_FOR
> -       || gimple_omp_for_kind (ctx->stmt) & GF_OMP_FOR_KIND_FOR)
> +       || gimple_omp_for_kind (ctx->stmt) == GF_OMP_FOR_KIND_FOR)
>       gimple_seq_add_stmt (ilist, build_omp_barrier (NULL_TREE));
>      }
>  


Grüße,
 Thomas

Attachment: pgpT85V3oWwkX.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to