2014-02-14 16:20 GMT+01:00 Richard Henderson <r...@redhat.com>:
> On 02/14/2014 06:41 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>> + else
>> + {
>> + t = plus_constant (Pmode, eax, UNITS_PER_WORD);
>> + emit_move_insn (eax, t);
>> + t = gen_rtx_PLUS (Pmode, stack_pointer_rtx, eax);
>> + }
>
> Uros is right that you don't need the move here: 8(rsp,rax) is a perfectly
> fine
> address.
>
>
> r~Oh, right. I missed that. Is prior patch ok with that adjustment? Regards, Kai
