> Uggh - what a mess. Surely that zero_extend:SI (const_int 1) should be > replaced by a move somewhere.
Actually the whole (zero_extend:SI (subreg:HI ...)) part is replaced by (const_int 1). It still ends up in constant pool though.
-Y
> Uggh - what a mess. Surely that zero_extend:SI (const_int 1) should be > replaced by a move somewhere.
Actually the whole (zero_extend:SI (subreg:HI ...)) part is replaced by (const_int 1). It still ends up in constant pool though.
-Y