> -----Original Message-----
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Jakub Jelinek
> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 3:50 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: Jason Merrill; 'Jeff Law'; 'Aldy Hernandez'; 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org';
> 'r...@redhat.com'
> Subject: Re: [PING] [PATCH] _Cilk_for for C and C++
>
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 08:41:14PM +0000, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
> > Did you get a chance to look at this _Cilk_for patch?
>
> IMHO it is not as much work as you are fearing, at most a few hours of work
> to get it right, and well worth doing. So, please at least try it out and if
> you
> get stuck with it, explain why.
Hi Jakub,
I tried it that way in the original patch submission for C
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-12/msg01369.html), but it hit a
dead-end when I was trying to get STL iterators working for C++. This is why I
re-structured things this way to get them both working.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
>
> Jakub
