Hi Jakub, I can confirm it's OK now. Thanks,
Christophe. On 10 January 2014 17:56, Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 10 January 2014 17:45, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 05:44:22PM +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote: >>> It seems this patch causes several regressions in gfortran on ARM too: >>> gfortran.dg/default_format_1.f90 >>> gfortran.dg/default_format_denormal_1.f90 >>> gfortran.dg/fmt_bz_bn.f >>> gfortran.dg/fmt_read_bz_bn.f90 >>> gfortran.dg/g77/f77-edit-t-in.f >>> gfortran.dg/list_read_4.f90 >>> gfortran.dg/namelist_11.f >>> gfortran.dg/past_eor.f90 >>> gfortran.dg/read_2.f90 >>> gfortran.dg/read_float_2.f03 >>> gfortran.dg/read_float_3.f90 >>> gfortran.dg/read_float_4.f90 >>> now fail after this patch. >> >> Even after the http://gcc.gnu.org/r206456 fix? >> > I don't know yet. My validations are still catching up with the backlog. > I'll tell you shortly.
