On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:59 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: >> On 11/19/13 19:33, David Malcolm wrote: >>> >>> >>> FWIW, it looks like you attached the whitespace cleanup patch again, >>> rather than the one you discuss above. >>> >>> For the archives, it looks like your email is referring to r205074 >>> (though that itself seems to have some purely whitespace fixes, together >>> with the real changes). >> >> Nuts. >> >> Here's the actual change I meant to attach. >> >> Sorry about that, thanks for catching it. >> >> Jeff >> >> >> commit f28876ff94428d3109e9e575d6a2d62d23af8092 >> Author: law <law@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4> >> Date: Wed Nov 20 01:55:17 2013 +0000 >> >> * tree-ssa-threadedge.c (thread_across_edge): After threading >> through a joiner, allow threading a normal block requiring >> duplication. >> >> * tree-ssa-threadupdate.c (thread_block_1): Improve code to detect >> jump threading requests that would muck up the loop structures. >> >> git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@205074 >> 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4 >> > > This caused: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59221 >
It also caused: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59597 -- H.J.
