On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 6:38 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen
<carew...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday 23 December 2013, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>> If you use
>>
>> {"corei7-avx", M_INTEL_COREI7_SANYBRIDGE},
>> {"core-avx2", M_INTEL_COREI7_HASWELL},
>> will it cause any problems? When there are both
>>
> Actually I seems I don't need these definitions any more after your clean-up
> of Intel architecture names. I have attached patch with them removed (and
> named haswell enums back to corei7_haswell).
It looks good to me. Thanks.
> If both target("arch=corei7-avx") and target("arch=sandybridge") is present
> the dispatcher appears to choose "sandybridge". If you want a warning for
This is OK with me.
> duplicates in this case, I suggest adding it in a later patch.
Will libgcc/config/i386/cpuinfo.c update be a separate patch?
Should we use a single definition for both i386.c and libgcc?
--
H.J.
