On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Andrey Belevantsev <a...@ispras.ru> wrote: > Hello, > > As described in the PR, the ICE reason was the typo made when introducing > calls to add_hard_reg_set. Fixed by the first attached patch, bootstrapped > and tested on both ia64 and x86_64, committed as obvious. > > The test case is very sensitive to the scheduler decisions (e.g. it didn't > fail on trunk but only on the revision reported for me), so instead of > adding the test I have put in the code two asserts checking that we can > always schedule the fence instruction as is. This hunk was tested together > with the first but committed separately. >
Testcase is very small. Why not add it? -- H.J.
