2013/12/17 Monk Chiang <sh.chian...@gmail.com>:
>
> I add comment to describe why I adding TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT,
> and fix typo in ChangeLog fle.
>
> Thank you for your suggestion.
>
> Index: ChangeLog
> ===================================================================
> --- ChangeLog   (revision 206039)
> +++ ChangeLog   (working copy)
> @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
> +2013-12-17  Monk Chiang  <sh.chian...@gmail.com>
> +
> +       * common/config/nds32/nds32-common.c (TARGET_DEFAULT_TARGET_FLAGS):
> +       Consider TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT settings.
> +
>  2013-12-16  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
>
>         * predict.h (PROB_LIKELY): Fix the value.
> Index: common/config/nds32/nds32-common.c
> ===================================================================
> --- common/config/nds32/nds32-common.c  (revision 206039)
> +++ common/config/nds32/nds32-common.c  (working copy)
> @@ -86,14 +86,23 @@
>
>  /* Run-time Target Specification.  */
>
> -/* Default enable
> +/* The default target flags consist of
> +   TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT and other MASK_XXX flags.
> +
> +   The value of TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT is set by
> +   the process of 'configure' and 'make' stage.
> +   Please check gcc/config.gcc for more implementation detail.
> +
> +   Other MASK_XXX flags are set individually.
> +   By default we enable
>       TARGET_GP_DIRECT: Generate gp-imply instruction.
>       TARGET_16_BIT   : Generate 16/32 bit mixed length instruction.
>       TARGET_PERF_EXT : Generate performance extention instrcution.
>       TARGET_CMOV     : Generate conditional move instruction.  */
>  #undef TARGET_DEFAULT_TARGET_FLAGS
>  #define TARGET_DEFAULT_TARGET_FLAGS            \
> -  (MASK_GP_DIRECT                              \
> +  (TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT                          \
> +   | MASK_GP_DIRECT                            \
>     | MASK_16_BIT                               \
>     | MASK_PERF_EXT                             \
>     | MASK_CMOV)
>
>
> Monk

Thanks for your revised patch. :)

Committed as Rev.206106:
  http://gcc.gnu.org/r206106


Best regards,
jasonwucj

Reply via email to