Richard, > Note I just want to help as well and I am not very familiar with > the details of the implementation here. So I'd rather have > a patch "obviously correct" to me - which expanding a condition > by several more checks isn't ;) >
Thanks a lot, I understand that very well. Any help is welcome. I will think about your recommendations and try to come up with a new version next week. Wish you a nice weekend, Bernd.
