Ian Lance Taylor <i...@google.com> writes: > On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Richard Sandiford > <rdsandif...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> I followed Joseph's suggestion and reused longlong.h. I copied it from >> libgcc rather than glibc since it seemed better for GCC to have a single >> version across both gcc/ and libgcc/. I can put it in include/ if that >> seems better. > > Actually copying complex code like this does not seem maintainable. I > think there needs to be only one copy in the GCC sources. If that > requires moving it back from libgcc to gcc, or moving it to include, > do that.
OK, will do, but which do you prefer? Thanks, Richard
