On 29 Nov 2013, at 19:38, "Andrew Pinski" <pins...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Matthias Klose <d...@ubuntu.com> wrote: >> Please let's pick aarch64. Everybody names it this way, except of course >> Debian > > And the linux kernel. > The Linux kernel reports aarch64 in its uname. It's only the source tree that uses arm64. Arm64 is also potentially problematic in regexp strings as it matches arm6*, which was used for some early ARM chips. R. >> :-/ If I understand ARM developers correctly, there will be something like >> aarch32 in the future (x32 for ARM), and I think you don't want to call it >> arm32. >> >> Matthias >> >> Am 29.11.2013 20:22, schrieb Ian Lance Taylor: >>> I've gotten a patch from Michael Hudson-Doyle to set GOARCH to arm64 >>> on an Aarch64 system (https://codereview.appspot.com/34830045/). I've >>> gotten a patch from Matthias Klose to set GOARCH to aarch64 on such a >>> system (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg03765.html). >>> >>> I don't care one way or another myself, but we need to pick one. >>> >>> Ian >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Matthias Klose <d...@ubuntu.com> wrote: >>>> This patch introduces aarch64 as a Go architecture. >>>> >>>> Matthias >> >
