On 11/25/2013 05:30 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 11/23/2013 10:08 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
I believe that our current practice is to have one error and then use
inform for follow-on messages. OK with that change.
Thanks. The multiple permerror and error aren't in the new code, my
patch just shuffles those around. I would be glad to work on that issue
too, but I think that the whole function should be audited, thus I would
rather go first with my patch as-is and then go back to that. Agreed?
OK.
Jason
