On 11/25/13 04:12, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
I'll prepare a patch to remove committed patches. But the first part
of series added new ISA extension support. It is independent from the
checker. Should it be OK to keep ISA in trunk?
I think this can/should reasonably be Uros's call.
I'm sorry we didn't get this moved far enough to make it into GCC 4.9;
if I had thought we were going run into these issues I wouldn't have
suggested you check in the preparatory patches only to have to back them
out later.
Jeff
