Uros prompted me to look into why we were still getting warnings
compiling the soft-fp code in libgcc despite this in config/t-softfp:
$(soft-fp-objects) : INTERNAL_CFLAGS += -Wno-missing-prototypes -Wno-type-limit
s
It turned out that soft-fp-objects still included the $srcdir prefix.
It seems my libgcc migration missed some chunk of code to strip that,
although I still see the warnings on the 4.6 branch (i.e. before the
migration).
Anyway, the following patch fixes this. Bootstrapped without
regressions on i386-pc-solaris2.11 and x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu and
verified the warnings are indeed gone.
Ok for mainline?
Rainer
2013-11-22 Rainer Orth <r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de>
* config/t-softfp (soft-fp-objects-base): New variable.
(soft-fp-objects): Use it.
diff --git a/libgcc/config/t-softfp b/libgcc/config/t-softfp
--- a/libgcc/config/t-softfp
+++ b/libgcc/config/t-softfp
@@ -88,8 +88,10 @@ endif
# for the functions in the soft-fp files have not been brought across
# from glibc.
-soft-fp-objects = $(addsuffix $(objext), $(softfp_file_list)) \
- $(addsuffix _s$(objext), $(softfp_file_list))
+soft-fp-objects-base = $(basename $(notdir $(softfp_file_list)))
+
+soft-fp-objects = $(addsuffix $(objext), $(soft-fp-objects-base)) \
+ $(addsuffix _s$(objext), $(soft-fp-objects-base))
$(soft-fp-objects) : INTERNAL_CFLAGS += -Wno-missing-prototypes -Wno-type-limits
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
