I have some small comments to the patch:
* You should also update gcc/doc/invoke.texi
Sergey Ostanevich wrote:
index 0026683..84911a0 100644
--- a/gcc/c-family/c.opt
+++ b/gcc/c-family/c.opt
...
+Wopenmp-simd
+C C++ Var(openmp_simd) Warning
+Warn about omp simd construct is overridden by cost model
--- a/gcc/fortran/lang.opt
+++ b/gcc/fortran/lang.opt
...
+Wopenmp-simd
+Fortran Warning
+Warn about omp simd construct is overridden by cost model
As the option files get merged, using
Wopenmp-simd
Fortran
; Documented in C
is sufficient.
+fsimd-cost-model=
+Common Joined RejectNegative Enum(vect_cost_model)
Var(flag_simd_cost_model) Init(VECT_COST_MODEL_DEFAULT)
+Specifies the cost model for vectorization in loops marked with omp simd
I wonder whether we need to care about Cilk Plus' "#pragma simd" in this
summary.
+ if (LOOP_VINFO_LOOP (loop_vinfo)->force_vect)
+ {
+ warning (OPT_Wopenmp_simd, "Vectorization did not happen
for the loop ",
+ "labeled as simd");
+ }
+
The warning line is too long.
Tobias
