> Also, I'm not sure I like doing the transformation from Cilk+ to OpenMP > syntax through rewriting tokens, rather than at the parsing level. > After all, the Cilk+ syntax is quite different, even when the patch pretends > it > is the same, consider e.g. the linear clause, which in Cilk+ allows to refer > to an > argument, in OpenMP doesn't. >
Actually, that is the only thing that I can think of that Cilk Plus elemental function is different from OpenMP. At this release, we are not planning to support it..
