On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:03:53PM +0100, Marc Glisse wrote: > On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Trevor Saunders wrote: > > >This patch adds a class auto_vec which releases its internal > >storage in its destructor, but unlike stack_vec it has no built in > >storage so its reasonable to use it in objects on the heap. It > >then replaces a bunch of vectors on the stack with stack_vec if > >the initial creation size was a compile time constant or auto_vec > >otherwise. > > Why not use stack_vec<T, 0>? You could partially specialize it if there > is waste, and you could make the 0 implicit.
I'd like to see it get used for stuff on the heap, but that depends on or at least only makes sense once other stuff uses destructors. Trev > > -- > Marc Glisse
