On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 11/14/13 14:14, Richard Biener wrote: >>> >>> >>> I'm just pointed out that of all the stuff you changed, these were the >>> only ones I saw where lifetimes were changed significantly. >> >> >> I still ask why we need a new type and cannot put this functionality into >> bitmap_head itself. > > Given that bitmap is just a *bitmap_head_def aren't we suggesting the same > thing?
Not sure - I thought Trevor wanted to make auto_bitmap a full C++ thing, not bitmap itself? Richard. > jeff
