On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:41:54PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Martin Jambor <mjam...@suse.cz> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the testcases I have added for IRA shrink wrapping preparation code
> > were not intended for -m32 on x86_64 and should not be tested with it,
> > thus I'm adding lp64 to the target requirements.
> >
> > Let me also briefly mention that I would like to make the testcases
> > also run on ppc64 and therefore I did not put them into
> > gcc.target/i386.
> >
> > I have tested the changes by running
> >
> > make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=ira-shrinkwrap-prep-?.c
> > --target_board=unix/\{,32\}" and
> > RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=pr10474.c --target_board=unix/\{,32\}"
> >
> > and examining the gcc.sum files.  Since this was recommended by Richi
> > on IRC, I will commit the change in a few minutes.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> >
> > 2013-11-13  Martin Jambor  <mjam...@suse.cz>
> >
> >         * testsuite/gcc.dg/ira-shrinkwrap-prep-1.c: Add lp64 to target
> >         requirements.
> >         * testsuite/gcc.dg/ira-shrinkwrap-prep-2.c: Likewise.
> 
> Those 2 pass on x32.
> 
> >         * testsuite/gcc.dg/pr10474.c: Likewise.
> >
> 
> This fails on x32.  Should it pass on x32?
> 

I would assume all three should be ignored as UNSUPPORTED on x32 now.
How exactly does it fail?

Martin

Reply via email to