On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:39:28AM -0500, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> >> Shall we also disable argument accumulation for cores? It seems we won't
> >> solve the IRA issues, right?
> > You mean LRA issues here, right? If you are starting to use
> > no-accumulate-outgoing-args much more often than in the past, I think
> > the problem that LRA forces a frame pointer in that case is much more
> > important now (or has that been fixed in the mean time?). Vlad?
> >
> >
> I guess it is serious. So it should fix this for gcc-4.9 in any case.
> I'd say it need 1-2 week of my work. Right now I am stiil thinking how
> to better approach to the implementation of it in LRA.
That would be nice. Given that it is a regression from 4.7 anyway, it can
be fixed in stage3 too, but preferrably sooner than later, so that there is
some time to tune the backend tunables.
Jakub
