hi Balaji, On 8 Nov 2013, at 10:01, Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Nov 8, 2013, at 4:09 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot....@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On 6 November 2013 08:04, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 02:24:01AM +0000, Iyer, Balaji V wrote: >>>> Fixed patch is attached. The responses to your question are given below. >>>> Is this patch OK? > >> May i suggest you rephrase the .exp so it does not line-wrap and is >> actually readable like in attached (untested) 01 or at least 00? > > I like the direction irrespective of line length. :-) the current cilk-plus c testsuite is now much more realistic in run-time (2:40mins vs. 160mins on my laptop) however: (i) it still fails to call " set_ld_library_path_env_vars " and thus fails to work properly on Darwin as described in a previous mail. (ii) it still does not work for installed testing viz: runtest --tool gcc --target_board=xxxx cilk-plus.exp (with some suitable xxxx and site.exp for your setup). (iii) I remain surprised (as perhaps was Jeff) that existing torture facilities were not the best solution for this. cheers Iain
