On 11 April 2013 14:18, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > On 04/11/2013 02:04 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >> >> I would have expected that somebody would tell me that omitting ::tmpnam >> violates 27.9.2 <cstdio> from the spec but noone yelled at me yet? > > Frankly, I didn't because the targets I really care about aren't affected. > The actual maintainers of this target should speak.
Attaching an updated patch that i was using since March (without
regressions) which takes Rainer's comments about _GLIBCXX_USE_TMPNAM
into account.
Ok for trunk?
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
2013-03-24 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <al...@gcc.gnu.org>
* acinclude.m4 (GLIBCXX_CHECK_TMPNAM): New check for tmpnam
function.
* configure.ac: Use GLIBCXX_CHECK_TMPNAM.
* (configure, config.h.in): Regenerate.
* include/c_global/cstdio: Guard ::tmpnam with _GLIBCXX_USE_TMPNAM
commit-6f2faa2
Description: Binary data
