On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 10:32:10AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> I'm looking for adjusting of live compute - either by adjusting the
> algorithm or by special casing the latches.  Like for example
> with the following (untested, needs cleanup - the PHI processing
> can be factored out from find_assert_locations_1 and re-used):
> 
> @@ -5904,6 +5898,27 @@ find_assert_locations (void)
>    for (i = 0; i < rpo_cnt; ++i)
>      bb_rpo[rpo[i]] = i;
>  
> +  /* Pre-seed loop latch liveness from loop header PHI nodes.  Due to
> +     the order we compute liveness and insert asserts we otherwise
> +     fail to insert asserts into the loop latch.  */
> +  loop_p loop;
> +  loop_iterator li;
> +  FOR_EACH_LOOP (li, loop, 0)
> +    {
> +      i = loop->latch->index;
> +      live[i] = sbitmap_alloc (num_ssa_names);
> +      bitmap_clear (live[i]);
> +      for (gimple_stmt_iterator gsi = gsi_start_phis (loop->header);
> +          !gsi_end_p (gsi); gsi_next (&gsi))
> +       {
> +         gimple phi = gsi_stmt (gsi);
> +         if (virtual_operand_p (gimple_phi_result (phi)))
> +           continue;
> +         for (unsigned j = 0; j < gimple_phi_num_args (phi); ++j)
> +           if (TREE_CODE (gimple_phi_arg_def (phi, j)) == SSA_NAME)
> +             bitmap_set_bit (live[i], SSA_NAME_VERSION 
> (gimple_phi_arg_def (phi, j)));
> +       }
> +    }

LGTM, except that I think we should only care about phi args from the
latch -> header edge, not others and IMHO it is memory waste to allocate
sbitmap even when we wouldn't add anything.  So, I'm going to
rebootstrap/regtest the following (including new testcase Jeff asked for):

2013-11-07  Richard Biener  <rguent...@suse.de>
            Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        * tree-vrp.c (find_assert_locations): Pre-seed live bitmaps for loop
        latches from header PHI arguments from the latch edge.

        * gcc.dg/unroll_1.c: Add -fno-tree-vrp to dg-options.
        * gcc.dg/unroll_2.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.dg/unroll_3.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.dg/unroll_4.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.dg/vrp90.c: New test.

--- gcc/tree-vrp.c.jj   2013-11-06 16:58:04.675678567 +0100
+++ gcc/tree-vrp.c      2013-11-07 10:59:38.841283931 +0100
@@ -5906,6 +5906,34 @@ find_assert_locations (void)
   for (i = 0; i < rpo_cnt; ++i)
     bb_rpo[rpo[i]] = i;
 
+  /* Pre-seed loop latch liveness from loop header PHI nodes.  Due to
+     the order we compute liveness and insert asserts we otherwise
+     fail to insert asserts into the loop latch.  */
+  loop_p loop;
+  loop_iterator li;
+  FOR_EACH_LOOP (li, loop, 0)
+    {
+      i = loop->latch->index;
+      unsigned int j = find_edge (loop->latch, loop->header)->dest_idx;
+      for (gimple_stmt_iterator gsi = gsi_start_phis (loop->header);
+          !gsi_end_p (gsi); gsi_next (&gsi))
+       {
+         gimple phi = gsi_stmt (gsi);
+         if (virtual_operand_p (gimple_phi_result (phi)))
+           continue;
+         tree arg = gimple_phi_arg_def (phi, j);
+         if (TREE_CODE (arg) == SSA_NAME)
+           {
+             if (live[i] == NULL)
+               {
+                 live[i] = sbitmap_alloc (num_ssa_names);
+                 bitmap_clear (live[i]);
+               }
+             bitmap_set_bit (live[i], SSA_NAME_VERSION (arg));
+           }
+       }
+    }
+
   need_asserts = false;
   for (i = rpo_cnt - 1; i >= 0; --i)
     {
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/unroll_1.c.jj  2013-09-09 11:32:36.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/unroll_1.c     2013-11-06 17:10:52.900722932 +0100
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-rtl-loop2_unroll=stderr -fno-peel-loops 
-fdisable-tree-cunroll -fdisable-tree-cunrolli -fenable-rtl-loop2_unroll" } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-rtl-loop2_unroll=stderr -fno-peel-loops 
-fno-tree-vrp -fdisable-tree-cunroll -fdisable-tree-cunrolli 
-fenable-rtl-loop2_unroll" } */
 
 unsigned a[100], b[100];
 inline void bar()
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/unroll_2.c.jj  2013-08-30 14:38:39.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/unroll_2.c     2013-11-06 17:10:30.751845504 +0100
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-rtl-loop2_unroll -fno-peel-loops 
-fdisable-tree-cunroll=foo -fdisable-tree-cunrolli=foo 
-fenable-rtl-loop2_unroll" } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-rtl-loop2_unroll -fno-peel-loops -fno-tree-vrp 
-fdisable-tree-cunroll=foo -fdisable-tree-cunrolli=foo 
-fenable-rtl-loop2_unroll" } */
 
 unsigned a[100], b[100];
 inline void bar()
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/unroll_3.c.jj  2013-08-30 14:38:39.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/unroll_3.c     2013-11-06 17:10:38.864800338 +0100
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-rtl-loop2_unroll -fno-peel-loops 
-fdisable-tree-cunroll -fdisable-tree-cunrolli -fenable-rtl-loop2_unroll=foo" } 
*/
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-rtl-loop2_unroll -fno-peel-loops -fno-tree-vrp 
-fdisable-tree-cunroll -fdisable-tree-cunrolli -fenable-rtl-loop2_unroll=foo" } 
*/
 
 unsigned a[100], b[100];
 inline void bar()
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/unroll_4.c.jj  2013-08-30 14:38:40.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/unroll_4.c     2013-11-06 17:11:03.816665603 +0100
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-rtl-loop2_unroll -fno-peel-loops 
-fdisable-tree-cunroll -fdisable-tree-cunrolli -fenable-rtl-loop2_unroll=foo2" 
} */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-rtl-loop2_unroll -fno-peel-loops -fno-tree-vrp 
-fdisable-tree-cunroll -fdisable-tree-cunrolli -fenable-rtl-loop2_unroll=foo2" 
} */
 
 unsigned a[100], b[100];
 inline void bar()
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp90.c.jj    2013-11-07 11:01:55.137535477 
+0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp90.c       2013-11-07 11:02:35.189335924 
+0100
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+/* { dg-do link } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-vrp1" } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "link_error" "vrp1"} } */
+/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "vrp1" } } */
+
+extern void link_error (void);
+
+__attribute__((noinline, noclone)) int
+foo (unsigned int n, int r)
+{
+  int i;
+  if (n > 0)
+    {
+      asm ("");
+      if (n < 10)
+       {
+         asm ("");
+         do
+           {
+             --n;
+             r *= 2;
+             if (n >= 9)
+               link_error ();
+           }
+         while (n > 0);
+       }
+    }
+  return r + n;
+}
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+  foo (7, 2);
+  return 0;
+}


        Jakub

Reply via email to