On 11/05/13 09:20, David Malcolm wrote:
I'm attaching a patch which allows gengtype to handle GTY-marked structs that have no fields. These are useful for supporting the "have a subclass for every gimple code" idea from: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg00057.html (and am bootstrapping a patch that does that, which needed this one for gengtype to cope).Successfully bootstrapped®tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?
OK. jeff