On 11/05/13 09:20, David Malcolm wrote:
I'm attaching a patch which allows gengtype to handle GTY-marked structs
that have no fields.  These are useful for supporting the "have a
subclass for every gimple code" idea from:
   http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg00057.html
(and am bootstrapping a patch that does that, which needed this one for
gengtype to cope).

Successfully bootstrapped&regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.

OK for trunk?
OK.
jeff

Reply via email to