Thanks! The three patches are commited as r204367, r204369 and r204371. Regards, Wei Mi.
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Jan Hubicka <hubi...@ucw.cz> wrote: >> Ping. Is it ok for x86 maintainer? > > I tought I already approved the x86 bits. >> >> Thanks, >> Wei Mi. >> >> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Wei Mi <w...@google.com> wrote: >> >> Go ahead and consider that pre-approved. Just send it to the list with a >> >> note that I approved it in this thread. >> >> >> >> Jeff >> > >> > Thanks! The new patch addressed Jeff's comments. >> > >> > Is it ok for x86 maintainer? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Wei Mi. >> > >> > 2013-10-16 Wei Mi <w...@google.com> >> > >> > * gcc/config/i386/i386.c (memory_address_length): Extract a part >> > of code to rip_relative_addr_p. >> > (rip_relative_addr_p): New Function. >> > (ix86_macro_fusion_p): Ditto. >> > (ix86_macro_fusion_pair_p): Ditto. >> > * gcc/config/i386/i386.h: Add new tune features about macro-fusion. >> > * gcc/config/i386/x86-tune.def (DEF_TUNE): Ditto. >> > * gcc/doc/tm.texi: Generated. >> > * gcc/doc/tm.texi.in: Ditto. >> > * gcc/haifa-sched.c (try_group_insn): New Function. >> > (group_insns_for_macro_fusion): Ditto. >> > (sched_init): Call group_insns_for_macro_fusion. >> > * gcc/target.def: Add two hooks: macro_fusion_p and >> > macro_fusion_pair_p. >> > > The i386 bits are OK. > > Honza
