Hi,
This is to fix testcase error reported in PR58985.
The intention of the testcase was to ensure there was no REG_EQUIV
notes generated for a reg which was used in a paradoxical subreg. When
target was x86, there was subreg generated so I omitted to add the
subreg in the regexp pattern. However there is no subreg generated for
target cris-axis-elf, so REG_EQUIV should be allowed.
Is it ok for trunk and gcc-4.8 branch?
Thanks,
Wei Mi.
2013-11-04 Wei Mi <w...@google.com>
PR regression/58985
* testsuite/gcc.dg/pr57518.c: Add subreg in regexp pattern.
Index: testsuite/gcc.dg/pr57518.c
===================================================================
--- testsuite/gcc.dg/pr57518.c (revision 204353)
+++ testsuite/gcc.dg/pr57518.c (working copy)
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-rtl-ira" } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-not
"REG_EQUIV\[^\n\]*mem\[^\n\]*\"ip\"" "ira" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-not
"REG_EQUIV\[^\n\]*mem\[^\n\]*\"ip\".*subreg" "ira" } } */
char ip[10];
int total;
