On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have committed a couple of testcases from the PR, the first was
> actually fixed by [1], the second is a short testcase that failed
> without the revert.
>
> 2013-10-27 Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com>
>
> PR target/58679
> * gcc.target/i386/pr58679-1.c: New test.
> * gcc.target/i386/pr58679-2.c: Ditto.
Now with the patch attached.
Uros.
Index: testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr58679-1.c
===================================================================
--- testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr58679-1.c (revision 0)
+++ testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr58679-1.c (working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -mavx" } */
+
+typedef struct { char a; long long b; } S;
+
+S foo (S x, S y)
+{
+ S z;
+
+ z.a = 0;
+ z.b = x.b / y.b;
+ return z;
+}
Index: testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr58679-2.c
===================================================================
--- testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr58679-2.c (revision 0)
+++ testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr58679-2.c (working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -mavx" } */
+
+int f (long long a, long long b)
+{
+ return (a * b) >> 16;
+}
