On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 09:17:55PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> 2013-08-24 Tobias Burnus <bur...@net-b.de>
>
> PR other/33426
> * g++.dg/parse/ivdep.C: New.
> * g++.dg/vect/pr33426-ivdep.cc: New.
FYI, I'm seeing various new FAILs on i686-linux:
+FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-ivdep-1.c (test for warnings, line )
+FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-ivdep-1.c -flto (test for warnings, line )
+FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-do-concurrent-1.f90 -O (test for warnings, line
)
+FAIL: g++.dg/vect/pr33426-ivdep.cc -std=gnu++98 (test for warnings, line )
+FAIL: g++.dg/vect/pr33426-ivdep.cc -std=gnu++11 (test for warnings, line )
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/vect/pr33426-ivdep.cc
> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target vect_float } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O3 -fopt-info-vec-optimized" } */
The problem is likely the same in all cases and same as I've mailed about
recently, dg-options should never be used in *.dg/vect/* testcases,
instead just use dg-additional-options, because otherwise the
required target options to enable vectorization aren't passed in.
Jakub
