On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:35 PM, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 10/24/13 07:40, Richard Biener wrote: >>>> >>>> we were supposed to remove mudflap for 4.9, no? >>>> >>>> >>> Really? I guess it hasn't been removed yet since the include is still >>> there? who is doing that? >> >> >> Yeah, nobody has done it yet appearantly :/ > > Well, here we go... > > > Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Obviously > the mudflap specific tests were deleted and not run and were manually > ignored when comparing testsuite runs. > > OK for the trunk?
Ok with preserving options as dummy, see examples like fargument-alias Common Ignore Does nothing. Preserved for backward compatibility. I don't think we should sorry (), but we can certainly warn that mudflap was replaced by -fsanitize=address(?). Implementing the warning properly isn't a requirement for the patch to go in (but the options should be still handled, but ignored). We can followup with a patch implementing the warning. Thanks, Richard. > jeff
